
Image http://www.mdux.net
As promised in my early November post – The road to model-based and connected PLM (part 9 – CM), I come back with more thoughts and ideas related to the future of configuration management. Moving from document-driven ways of working to a data-driven and model-based approach fundamentally changes how you can communicate and work efficiently.
Let’s be clear: configuration management’s target is first of all about risk management. Ensuring your company’s business remains sustainable, efficient, and profitable.
By providing the appropriate change processes and guidance, configuration management either avoids costly mistakes and iterations during all phases of a product lifecycle or guarantees the quality of the product and information to ensure safety.
Companies that have not implemented CM practices probably have not observed these issues. Or they have not realized that the root cause of these issues is a lack of CM.
Similar to what is said in smaller companies related to PLM, CM is often seen as an overhead, as employees believe they thoroughly understand their products. In addition, CM is seen as a hurdle to innovation because of the standardization of practices. So yes, they think it is normal that there are sometimes problems. That’s life.
I already wrote about this topic in 2010 PLM, CM and ALM – not sexy 😦 – where ALM means Asset Lifecycle Management – my focus at that time.
Hear it from the experts
To shape the discussion related to the future of Configuration Management, I had a vivid discussion with three thought leaders in this field: Lisa Fenwick, Martijn Dullaart and Maxime Gravel. A short introduction of the three of them:
Lisa Fenwick, VP Product Development at CMstat, a leading company in Configuration Management and Data Management software solutions and consulting services for aviation, aerospace & defense, marine, and other high-tech industries. She has over 25 years of experience with CM and Deliverables Management, including both government and commercial environments.
Ms. Fenwick has achieved CMPIC SME, CMPIC CM Assessor, and CMII-C certifications. Her experience includes implementing CM software products, CM-related consulting and training, and participation in the SAE and IEEE standards development groups
Martijn Dullaart is the Lead Architect for Enterprise Configuration Management at ASML (Our Dutch national pride) and chairperson of the Industry 4.0 committee of the Institute Process Excellence (IPX) Congress. Martijn has his own blog mdux.net, and you might have seen him recently during the PLM Roadmap & PDT Fall conference in November – his thoughts about the CM future can be found on his blog here
Maxime Gravel, Manager Model-Based Engineering at Moog Inc., a worldwide designer, manufacturer, and integrator of advanced motion control products. Max has been the director of the model-based enterprise at the Institute for Process Excellence (IPX) and Head of Configuration and Change Management at Gulfstream Aerospace which certified the first aircraft in a 3D Model-Based Environment.
What we discussed:
We had an almost one-hour discussion related to the following points:
- The need for Enterprise Configuration Management – why and how
- The needed change from document-driven to model-based – the impact on methodology and tools
- The “neural network” of data – connecting CM to all other business domains, a similar view as from the PLM domain,
I kept from our discussion the importance of planning – as seen in the CMstat image on the left.
To plan which data you need to manage and how you will manage the data. How often are you doing this in your company’s projects?
Next, all participants stressed the importance of education and training on this topic – get educated. Configuration Management is not a topic that is taught at schools. Early next year, I will come back on education as the benefits of education are often underestimated. Not everything can be learned by “googling.”
Conclusion
The journey towards a model-based and data-driven future is not a quick one to be realized by new technologies. However, it is interesting to learn that the future of connected data (the “neural network”) allows organizations to implement both CM and PLM in a similar manner, using graph databases and automation. When executed at the enterprise level, the result will be that CM and PLM become natural practices instead of other siloed system-related disciplines.
Most of the methodology is there; the implementation to make it smooth and embedded in organizations will be the topics to learn. Join us in discussing and learning!
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 21, 2021 at 8:27 am
Bart Willemsen
Very nice discussion about CM/CM2 and very recognizable. The biggest problem is that companies don’t know CM as a concept for the whole enterprise. For me it took 2 years to get approval for a cm2 training (and only cm2-01) because nobody understand that it could help the performance of the company.
Thanks for your feedback Bart, I agree, if your company does not have the CM culture at the top, people consider it bureaucratic (like what they often say also about PLM) . Best regards, Jos
LikeLike
December 22, 2021 at 2:34 am
Lee Perrin
Your philosophy of CM gave me pause for thought.
In my previous role as the global CM leader for a large aerospace company, I wouldn’t have used risk management as my first thought on the target of CM. Design assurance, compliance, providing access to information and interfaces to other key systems also came to mind. I usually tried to mitigate risks, as you alluded to, and minimize them wherever possible.
From time to time we had to search for creative ways to maintain compliance to customer specs while also providing cost effective solutions. Sometimes it was a delicate balancing act, other times required a firmer outcome.
Model based engineering will provide a very important path to vendor-manufacturer relationships, helping to ensure accuracy in product build. Change control would be the area to pay attention to in my mind. Visibility into changes, control and understanding of same, and consistency are key. All this to be done in environments where resources (people) may be less numerous, leading to greater reliance on PDM/PLM/SLM systems.
I first encountered the pillars of CM diagram in 1999 at ISCM.
Thanks for the interesting read and video.
Thanks for sharing your experiences Lee, illustrating your target and challenges of realizing CM. Feel free to be in touch with the participants to this CM session as they all “breathe” CM (or perhaps you know them already? Best regards, Jos
LikeLike